Deskripsi Pelaku Perundungan pada Anak Usia Didik Sebagai Isu Psikologi Sosial di Indonesia

Charles Petra Nicolaas Rembang

Abstract


Abstract: Bullying is an effort or action carried out by individual human beings, both personally and collectively that attacks a target repeatedly physically, psychologically, socially or verbally, which is carried out in a situationally defined position of strength for their own benefit or satisfaction (Elinda Emza, 2015). Another opinion defines bullying as the use of aggression in any form that aims to hurt or corner other people physically or mentally.
Purpose: To describe and explain the perpetrators of bullying in school-aged children as a social psychological issue in Indonesia. In terms of (1) the perpetrators of bullying, (2) the causes of bullying, (3) the process of bullying behavior, (4) excesses of bullying behavior.
Methodology: This research is a research with a descriptive qualitative approach, namely a research method that utilizes qualitative data which is described according to the existing conditions and facts. Descriptive method is a method in examining the status of human groups, an object, condition, a system of thought or a class of events in the present. The strength of this method lies in the facts that are happening now. Data collection by means of interviews, journals, digital books, mainstream media such as mass media, social media (XL nodes), libraries, data agencies or organizations. Data Collection Techniques use the Fishbone Technique, which emphasizes collecting data from various sources and collectors. The data analysis technique uses the Morphology Technique, which is a technique that describes the quality of a problem that explains it comprehensively.
Implication: Bullying in Student Age Children as a Social Psychological Issue is a reality whose phenomenon occurs everywhere. In the case of perpetrators of bullying, this is a big problem that must be handled together. Data on bullying in Indonesia, especially on students in their teens, is still very high. The perpetrators of bullying continue to carry out their actions because there are still many reproaches that are open to repetition. Students are the main perpetrators of bullying on other students. Teachers, parents and the community either directly or indirectly have played a role in bullying. The process of bullying; Social media is the most powerful tool for perpetrators of bullying that can continue in the real world. Educational institutions and systems do not clearly handle cases of bullying, especially for perpetrators. The government and schools have not been firm in terms of bullying rules and laws. The perpetrator commits bullying in verbal and non-verbal ways. Causes of bullying behavior; there are problems that arise from the perpetrator who is mentally unstable; Another cause is the existence of problems in the social psychology of society which indirectly help perpetrators commit bullying. The excesses of bullying behavior include: The excesses for the bully are legal issues, negotiations, revenge and repetition of acts that can turn them into criminals, radicals and terrorists. Victims of bullying can become perpetrators in the future. If the perpetrators of bullying are not prevented, they can become predators for the next victims. That bullying is a behavior that can be modified through the education process.


Keywords


Actors, bullying, children, school age, social psychology, Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brighi, A., Melotti, G., Guarini, A., Genta, M. L., Ortega, R., Mora-Merchán, J., . Thompson, F. (2012). Self-esteem and loneliness in relation to cyberbullying in three European countries. In Q. Li, D. Cross, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 32-56). : Wiley-Blackwell.

Brochado, S., Soares, S., & Fraga, S. (2016). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(5), 523–531

Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estevez, A., Villardon, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128-1135

Chaplin, J. P., Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada Hal. 472.

Coloroso B., 2006, Penindasan Tertindas Dan Penonton. Resep Pemutus Rantai Kekerasan Anak Dari Prasekolah hingga SMU, Serambi, Jakarta, hlm.44.

Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. W. H. Freeman and Company : San Fransisco

Drever, James, A Dictionary of Psychology, Pinguin Books Inc., Baltimore, 1960.

Gerungan, W. A., Psikologi Sosial, Bandung: PT Eresco. Hal. 48.

Helen C. & Dawn J, 2007, Penanganan Kekerasaan di Sekolah (Pendekatan Lingkup Sekolah Untuk Mencapai Praktik Terbaik), Penerjemah : Ursula Gyani, PT.Indeks, Jakarta, hlm.14.

Natzir M., 1988, Metode Penelitian, Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.

Papalia, D. E., Old, S. W., & Feldman, R. D. (2008). Human development (Psikologi perkembangan). Diterjemahkan oleh: A.K. Anwar. Jakarta : Kencana

Prunckun H., 2010, Handbook of Scientific Method of Inquiry for Intelligence Analysis, The Scarecrow Press Inc. p 40

Rice, F. P., & Dolgin, K. G. (2008). The adolescent development, relationship, and culture (Edisi kelima). USA: Pearson Publication

Sherif, M and C. W. Sherif, An Outlin of Social Psychology, Harper and Brothers, New York, 1956.

Sugiyono, 2005, Metode Penelitian Administrasi, bandung: Alfabeta.

Yayasan Sejiwa, 2008, Bullying Mengatasi Kekerasaan Disekolah Dan Lingkungan Sekitar Anak, Grasindo, Jakarta, hlm.2.

Whitney F., The Element of Research. New York: Prentice-Hall Inc. 1960,

Bullying di Sekolah : Kurangnya Empati Pelaku Bullying dan

Pencegahan. Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa Volume 7 No 3, Hal 237 - 246, November 2019

Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estevez, A., Villardon, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128-1135

Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (2013). Cyberbullying: Prevalence, stability and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28(2), 171-192

Erdur-Baker, O. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender, and frequent, and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Society, 12(1), 109-125

Garaigordobil, M., & Martinez-Valderrey, V. (2015). Effects of cyberprogram 2.0 on “face-to-face” bullying, cyberbullying, and empathy. Psicothema, 27(1), 4551.

juridiksiam.unram.ac.id/index.php/juridiksiam/article/view/140

journal.ubm.ac.id/index.php/psibernetika/article/view/1745

Laras Bethari Ragasukmasuci & Maria Goretti Adiyanti. 2019. Kecenderungan Remaja menjadi Pelaku Perundungan-Siber: Kontribusi Harga Diri dan Kesepian. Gadjah Mada Journa Psychology. VOLUME 5, NO. 2, 2019: 187-203

Larraaga, E., Yubero, S., Ovejero, A., & Navarro, R. (2016). Loneliness, parent-child communication and cyberbullying victimization among Spanish youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 1-8

Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy, and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393-411

Ortega, F. B, Lee, D. C, Katzmarzyk, P. T., Ruiz, J. R., Sui, X., Church, T. S., & Blair, S. N. (2012). The intriguing metabolically healthy but obese phenotype: cardiovascular prognosis and role of fitness, Eur Heart J. 34(5), 389-97

Sarwono, Sarlito Wirawan, Teori-teori Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2002.

Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S, & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatri, 49(4), 376-385

Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community and Social Psychology, 23(1), 52-67

Sengupta, A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Are social networking sites a source of online harassment for teens? Evidence from survey data. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 284- 290

William, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 516-521.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescent: an intergrated model of its attraction, opportunities and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121-127

Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316




DOI: https://doi.org/10.61390/euanggelion.v3i2.56

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Charles Petra Nicolaas Rembang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

EUANGGELION indexed by:

  

EUANGGELION: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen
Published: Sekolah Tinggi Agama Kristen Lentera Bangsa Manado
Website Institusi: https://staklb-manado.ac.id/
ISSN: 2797-314X  (online)
Address: Gedung Sehati (Ex. Bank Pinaesaan), Jl. Samratulangi No. 162 Manado

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.